Es Posible
CJNG is one engineer away from the sky
Today, to kill a police officer with a drone, you need a man hiding behind a screen. One man, one drone, one dead.
The day the swarm arrives, that man flies nothing. He types an order and a hundred machines divide the work among themselves.
That day the weapon does not change. What changes is who rules the ground.
This work belongs to three people. For Ghaleb Krame and Amanda Davies, with whom we built the model, defended the numbers and put the date on it.
No government pays for this work. No party. No advertiser. The reader pays for it. Share it, and if it raises money, forty percent is yours.
In February 2026, Ghaleb Krame, Amanda Davies and the author of these lines presented a paper in Cyprus that did something nobody had done: put a calendar on the day the Jalisco New Generation Cartel stops being a group that uses drones and becomes a group that operates with swarms. The jury awarded it best research of the conference. The window we produced was twelve to eighteen months.
That same month El Mencho was killed and the cartel answered across twenty states. Five months later, the United States Treasury executed the largest action in its history against that cartel and named a United States citizen as its leader. We did not react to that news. It was already written, with an international jury and an earlier publication date.
What follows explains how you put a date on something like this, and why the clock does not stop with soldiers.
Start with the one thing you have to understand. Everything else comes out of it.
A cartel drone today works like this: a man hides a kilometer away, watches a screen, flies the machine with his hands, drops the load and leaves. He is a sniper with wings. Dangerous, yes. But one at a time, against one target.
A swarm works differently, and the difference is not quantity. It is nature. In a swarm nobody flies anything. The operator marks a zone and the software divides the work among a hundred machines that talk to each other, correct themselves, replace whichever one falls and close the formation again. Shoot down twenty and the remaining eighty recalculate and keep going.
It is the difference between a man with a rifle and an infantry company. Except the company does not eat, does not sleep, does not desert and has no mother to claim it.
The Mexican state has answered violence with one formula for twenty years: send more men. More soldiers, more national guard, more convoys. That formula works against an enemy who fires bullets.
Against a swarm it inverts. Concentrating troops stops being strength and becomes a target. A convoy is exactly what a swarm is designed to destroy: many objectives bunched together, no roof, no dispersion. Same for a checkpoint, a base, a rally, a polling station, a refinery.
And the arithmetic of money inverts too. A commercial machine costs what a motorcycle costs. Defending a single building against a swarm costs what a helicopter costs. The attacker spends little and the defender spends everything. That asymmetry is what turned the Houthis, a group from a ruined country, into an actor capable of shutting down Red Sea commerce.
So this investigation is not about drones. It is about the date the Mexican government loses the advantage of having more men.
Here is the number nobody has put on the table, and it is the heart of all of it.
The cartel does not need more people to have a swarm. It needs the same handful of operators it already has, with different software on top. What multiplies is not the payroll. It is what that payroll can reach in one night.
He has to watch the screen, fly, drop and get out. While he does, he can do nothing else.
He marks the zone and releases. The machines divide up, correct themselves and replace the ones that fall.
Multiply that by the size of the unit. We documented that CJNG already has one, with patches and its own training, and that in 2023 it taught another cartel to do the same.
Ten operators who today can hit ten points in one night hit a thousand with a swarm. It is not a bigger force. It is a different country.
And there is a political consequence almost nobody has said out loud. With that capability, a cartel stops negotiating territory with the government and starts negotiating another way: it can shut down an airport, paralyze a refinery, make an election impossible in an entire state. It stops being a security problem and becomes a sovereignty problem.
“The violence of February 22Chapter 04
does not bring the cartel closer to the swarm.
One engineer does.
Nothing that follows is interpretation. Every line has a primary source behind it, and it is cited.
CJNG drones documented in Jalisco and Michoacán: surveillance and propaganda. FACT · Krame, Vivoda & Davies, Small Wars & Insurgencies 34(6), 2023.
Tepalcatepec: drones with explosives against rivals. Guanajuato: leaflets dropped from the air. FACT · Krame et al., 2023.
Villa Victoria: first explosive drone attack against state forces, with damage to homes. FACT · Sullivan & Bunker, SW&I 33(4), 2022.
Encarnación de Díaz: two police officers killed by drone. The model reads it as Rogers confirmation stage. FACT · Krame et al., 2023.
The State Department designates CJNG as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and SDGT. FACT · Federal Register 2025-02873.
Sanctions on El Mencho and four commanders under counterterrorism authorities, E.O. 13224. FACT · Treasury, 18 jun 2025.
Awarded at EMCIS, Cyprus: 12 to 18 months to swarms via the hybrid path. CJNG Index 0.50. SOURCE · Krame, Davies & Levy, EMCIS 2026.
Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes killed in a special forces operation with United States intelligence. Reprisal across twenty states, twenty-five national guards killed. FACT · SEDENA, 23 feb 2026; Lieber Institute, West Point, mar 2026.
The largest OFAC action in its history against CJNG. Names Juan Carlos Valencia González, alias Pelón, alias 03, a United States citizen, as leader. Five million dollar reward. FACT · Treasury sb0573, 23 jul 2026.
These are the five. Each one is measured from zero to ten, where zero is having none of it and ten is having all of it. This is how CJNG scored.
Read them top to bottom and you see the problem at a glance: on four of the five the cartel is well supplied. The short bar is the one that decides.
Two crossed fast, one did not cross despite having everything, and one crossed with a state helping. The rule comes out of that.
| Case | RES | EXTSUP | INTCAP | ILLOG | DEMAND | Index | Crossed within 24 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJNG (paper, 2025) | 0.70 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.50 | to be determined |
| ISIS 2014-2017 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.85 |
| Hezbollah 2004-2024 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.10 |
| Russia and Iran in Ukraine 2022-2024 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.95 |
| Houthis 2017-2020 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.85 |
This is where the model says something nobody wants to hear, which is why it is worth reading slowly.
Everyone assumes two things. That the more violent a group is, the closer it gets to bigger weapons. And that the more money it has, the sooner it gets them. Both are false, and the four precedents prove it.
Hezbollah had everything. Money, its own engineers, and Iran handing it technology for twenty years. It did not cross to swarms. What it lacked was hurry: it was not fighting for its existence.
ISIS had almost nothing. No state backing it, no reserves. It crossed in under two years. It had two things: engineers and smuggling.
That is where we drew the rule from, and it fits in one line. You need urgency, plus one of two doors: either a state that supplies you, or your own people who know how.
SWARM ⇐ URGENCY ∧ [ ( A STATE SUPPLYING YOU ∧ MONEY ) ∨ ( YOUR OWN PEOPLE ∧ SMUGGLING ) ]
Now run CJNG through that rule, with the numbers we calibrated.
Money it has to spare, 0.70. Smuggling, which is its trade, 0.80. Urgency, since El Mencho was killed, very high. A state supplying it, almost none, 0.20.
It has everything but one thing. Its own people who know how: 0.50. And in this arithmetic a chain is worth what its weakest link is worth. That is why the final index comes out at 0.50 and no higher.
We fed the model what happened in February. Twenty-five national guards killed, reprisals across twenty states, urgency spiking to 0.90.
The index did not move. Still 0.50.
Then we raised technical talent by a single tenth, from 0.50 to 0.60. The index jumped to 0.60 and CJNG landed on the same side as ISIS and the Houthis, the two that did cross.
Read it again. All the blood of February did not bring the cartel one day closer to the swarm. One hired engineer does.
If the bottleneck were money, Mexico would be lost: the cartel has more than the state. If it were violence, lost too: it has all of it.
But the bottleneck is people. And the people who can build this in Mexico are not millions, or thousands. They are engineers in electronics, computer vision and flight control. In the whole country they fit in one auditorium. Maybe fifty of them decide the matter.
Which means this problem, unlike almost every other one in Mexico, can actually be solved, and costs less than any military operation. You do not have to win a war. You have to get a few dozen people to take a different job, and get the ones already inside to walk out.
Every one who joins moves the clock forward. Every one who leaves, by arrest, by defection or because someone offered them something better, takes it with them.
Educational tool. It applies the paper rule to any profile and projects timelines with the Appendix B sensitivity grid. It is not operational data and it imputes nothing to anyone.
Hybrid
Binding condition: INTCAP · in-house technical talent
Open door: B · talent plus logistics
Projected timeline: 12 to 18 months
Right on the edge. Neither in nor out of the set of actors that crossed in under twenty-four months.
“Hezbollah had money, talentChapter 03
and a state behind it.
It did not cross because it was not in a hurry.
| Path | Base timeline | What speeds it up | Where it breaks | Countermeasure that stretches it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-house development | 4 to 6 years | Ex-military, safe workshops, iteration | Scarce talent, risky testing, communications | Infiltrate recruitment, neutralize workshops |
| External acquisition | 2 to 3 years | Middlemen, front companies, transshipment through third countries | Traceability, supplier dependence | Broker sanctions, customs profiling, darknet |
| Hybrid | 12 to 18 months | Modules bought abroad, integrated by the local unit | Coordination, partial exposure | Both of the above at once: talent and inputs |
The paper was presented in February 2026. Twelve months from then is February 2027. Eighteen is August 2027.
If state pressure eases, the clock moves up six months. If pressure rises on talent and inputs at the same time, the hybrid path slides to a range of eighteen to thirty months. The decision window is not in 2027. It is now.
We documented a semi-formal unit inside CJNG. They are called the Operadores Droneros. They have patches, they have training, and in 2023 they transferred capability to La Familia Michoacana.
That unit is not an anecdote. That unit is the INTCAP condition. And INTCAP is the number that binds the whole system.
Translated into public policy, with no academia in the way: every engineer, every technician, every ex-soldier who joins that unit is worth more to the swarm than any highway ambush. And every one who leaves, by arrest, defection or cooperation, stretches the clock for everyone.
The three countermeasures we propose for the internal path attack exactly that variable and no other: infiltrate recruitment, neutralize workshops, and control the export of computing and vision modules.
The other door, EXTSUP, is nearly shut at 0.20. But we flagged something worth underlining: Chinese and Iranian drone supply channels already fed Russia and the Houthis. Those pipes exist and they work.
A single state-backed supplier opens that door. That is the second indicator to watch, and the one that would change the clock overnight.
Evidence levels: A conviction · B indictment or designation · C documented operation · D indication. No designation is a verdict. Every person named retains the presumption of innocence.
Alias Pelón, 03, Tricky Tres. Born September 12, 1984 in Santa Ana, California. United States citizen. Stepson of El Mencho. OFAC identifies him as CJNG leader since February 2026 and designates him on July 23, 2026. Federal narcotics indictment in Washington D.C. Five million dollar reward.
Alias El Sapo. Designated by OFAC under counterterrorism authorities on June 18, 2025. Treasury identifies him as principal lieutenant of the new leadership.
Alias El Jardinero. Designated by OFAC on June 18, 2025. Captured by Mexican forces in 2026 according to the Michoacán prosecutor, which keeps the file sealed.
A foreign terrorist organization led by a United States citizen needs no extradition to be tried under United States counterterrorism law.
And the swarm, by definition, gets built out of what we call modules in the model: computing, vision, navigation. Every module that crosses the border is a document. Every document is a jurisdiction.
Covers training, expert advice, personnel and equipment. Applies to anyone in the United States or subject to its jurisdiction. Penalty up to life if a death results. Every engineer recruited, every module shipped and every payment to a broker is a chargeable act. Venue: D.D.C., where the indictment against Valencia González already sits, or C.D. Cal.
Components exported without a license or with a false end user. The computing boards and vision modules the paper describes are exactly the Bureau of Industry and Security catalog. The hybrid path, the twelve to eighteen month one, lives off this gap.
Any dealing with a designee under E.O. 13224 without an OFAC license. More than two hundred fifty designees linked to CJNG since 2015. A drone supplier who bills any of them is already inside the list.
A § 2339B violation is a specified unlawful activity for money laundering purposes. Swarm money launders through the same pipe as fentanyl. This connects the investigation directly to El Gran Lavado.
To move this from academic inference to case file, one thing is needed, and it is already identified: the Bureau of Industry and Security license and denial record for exports to Mexico of embedded computing modules, computer vision and RF links classified under ECCN 4A and 5A, from 2023 to 2026, cross-referenced against the SDN list.
FOIA request to BIS: in preparation. That document turns a projection into a file.
“Every module that crosses the borderChapter 08
is a document.
| Data point | Primary source | Date | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Five conditions, memberships, minimized rule, timelines | Krame, Davies & Levy, EMCIS 2026, Best Completed Research Paper | 02·2026 | SOURCE |
| Index 0.50 and binding variable | This investigation calculating over Table A2 | 28·08·2026 | ANALYSIS |
| CJNG FTO and SDGT designation | Federal Register 2025-02873 · State Department | 20·02·2025 | FACT |
| Sanctions on El Mencho and four commanders | Treasury / OFAC, E.O. 13224 and 14059 | 18·06·2025 | FACT |
| Death of El Mencho, reprisal, 25 national guards killed | SEDENA · Lieber Institute, West Point · Small Wars Journal | 22-23·02·2026 | FACT |
| New leader, citizenship, indictment, reward | Treasury sb0573 · NCTC Antiterrorism Guide | 23·07·2026 | FACT |
| 221 drone incidents 2021-2025 | NCITE, University of Nebraska Omaha | 02·2026 | SOURCE |
| Villa Victoria, Encarnación de Díaz, Operadores Droneros | Krame, Vivoda & Davies, SW&I 34(6) · Sullivan & Bunker, SW&I 33(4) | 2022-2023 | FACT |
We say it before anyone else does. There is no direct public evidence that CJNG has bought artificial intelligence modules for drones. We infer it from its purchasing practices in other sectors and from the compared cases. There is no official drone incident figure for 2026. The Michoacán prosecutor file on Flores Silva could not be obtained. And the calibration of the five conditions is expert judgment over open sources, robust to plus or minus 0.33 by our own testing, not direct measurement.
Right of reply is open. Any response from the people named is published in full on this page.
Forty percent of what this investigation raises is yours if you share it and join in.